Exploring Consequences of Simulation Design for Apparent Performance of Statistical Methods. 2: Results from simulations with normally and uniformly distributed sample sizes
Elena Kulinskaya, David C. Hoaglin, and Ilyas Bakbergenuly

TL;DR
This paper examines how different simulation design choices, specifically the distribution of sample sizes, influence the apparent performance of statistical methods in meta-analysis of log-odds-ratios, extending prior work on constant sample sizes.
Contribution
It investigates the impact of normally and uniformly distributed sample sizes on simulation outcomes, providing new insights into simulation design effects in statistical method evaluation.
Findings
Sample size distribution affects method performance conclusions.
Results differ between normal and uniform sample size simulations.
Implications for designing simulation studies in meta-analysis.
Abstract
This report continues our investigation of effects a simulation design may have on the conclusions on performance of statistical methods. In the context of meta-analysis of log-odds-ratios, we consider five generation mechanisms for control probabilities and log-odds-ratios. Our first report (Kulinskaya et al. 2020) considered constant sample sizes. Here we report on the results for normally and uniformly distributed sample sizes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Inference
