On the nature of near-threshold bound and virtual states
Inka Matuschek, Vadim Baru, Feng-Kun Guo, Christoph Hanhart

TL;DR
This paper extends Weinberg's criterion to classify near-threshold states as bound, virtual, or resonant, clarifying the nature of these states based on their pole positions and residues.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Weinberg's criterion can be applied to shallow virtual states, providing a clearer classification of near-threshold states.
Findings
Virtual states are predominantly molecular in nature.
Non-molecular states are mainly bound states or resonances.
Classification scheme has limitations in certain cases.
Abstract
Physical states are characterised uniquely by their pole positions and the corresponding residues. Accordingly, in those parameters also the nature of the states should be encoded. For bound states (poles on the real -axis below the lowest threshold on the physical sheet) there is an established criterion formulated originally by Weinberg in the 1960s, which allows one to estimate the amount of compact and molecular components in a given state. We demonstrate in this paper that this criterion can be straightforwardly extended to shallow virtual states (poles on the real -axis below the lowest threshold on the unphysical sheet) which should be classified as molecular. We argue that predominantly non-molecular or compact states exist either as bound states or as resonances (poles on the unphysical sheet off the real energy axis) but not as virtual states. We also discuss the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
