A partially linearized spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic dynamics. II. Analysis and comparison with related approaches
J. R. Mannouch, J. O. Richardson

TL;DR
This paper compares a new partially linearized spin-mapping method, spin-PLDM, with fully linearized approaches, showing that spin-PLDM reduces errors and can be systematically improved for nonadiabatic quantum dynamics.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes a partially linearized spin-mapping approach, spin-PLDM, demonstrating its advantages over fully linearized methods in accuracy and systematic improvability.
Findings
spin-PLDM contains an additional term reducing errors
Systematic improvement possible via re-sampling at intermediate times
Focused initial conditions reduce trajectory requirements
Abstract
In the previous paper [J. R. Mannouch and J. O. Richardson, J.~Chem.~Phys.~xxx, xxxxx (xxxx)] we derived a new partially linearized mapping-based classical-trajectory technique, called spin-PLDM. This method describes the dynamics associated with the forward and backward electronic path integrals, using a Stratonovich-Weyl approach within the spin-mapping space. While this is the first example of a partially linearized spin mapping method, fully linearized spin mapping is already known to be capable of reproducing dynamical observables for a range of nonadiabatic model systems reasonably accurately. Here we present a thorough comparison of the terms in the underlying expressions for the real-time quantum correlation functions for spin-PLDM and fully linearized spin mapping in order to ascertain the relative accuracy of the two methods. In particular, we show that spin-PLDM contains an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
