Reduced Thermal Conductivity of Supported and Encased Monolayer and Bilayer MoS$_2$
Alexander J. Gabourie, Saurabh V. Suryavanshi, Amir Barati Farimani,, Eric Pop

TL;DR
This study uses molecular dynamics to quantify how substrate support and encasing significantly reduce the thermal conductivity of monolayer and bilayer MoS₂, with implications for device applications involving 2D semiconductors.
Contribution
It provides detailed molecular dynamics analysis of thermal conductivity changes in MoS₂ due to substrate support and encapsulation, highlighting the role of phonon scattering and screening effects.
Findings
Supported monolayer MoS₂ has ~73% lower TC than suspended.
Encasing further reduces TC of monolayer MoS₂ to ~22 W/mK.
Bilayer MoS₂ retains higher TC than monolayer under similar conditions.
Abstract
Electrical and thermal properties of atomically thin two-dimensional (2D) materials are affected by their environment, e.g. through remote phonon scattering or dielectric screening. However, while it is known that mobility and thermal conductivity (TC) of graphene are reduced on a substrate, these effects are much less explored in 2D semiconductors such as MoS. Here, we use molecular dynamics to understand TC changes in monolayer (1L) and bilayer (2L) MoS by comparing suspended, supported, and encased structures. The TC of monolayer MoS is reduced from ~117 WmK when suspended, to ~31 WmK when supported by SiO, at 300 K. Encasing 1L MoS in SiO further reduces its TC down to ~22 WmK. In contrast, the TC of 2L MoS is not as drastically reduced, being >50% higher than 1L both when supported and encased. These effects are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
