Imperfect 1-out-of-2 quantum oblivious transfer: bounds, a protocol, and its experimental implementation
Ryan Amiri (1), Robert St\'arek (2), David Reichmuth (1), Ittoop V, Puthoor (1), Michal Mi\v{c}uda (2), Ladislav Mi\v{s}ta Jr (2), Miloslav, Du\v{s}ek (2), Petros Wallden (3), Erika Andersson (1) ((1) SUPA, Institute, of Photonics, Quantum Sciences, Heriot-Watt University

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new theoretical framework for quantum oblivious transfer, derives bounds on cheating probabilities, presents an improved protocol with experimental implementation, and analyzes its security and performance.
Contribution
It develops a framework for semirandom quantum oblivious transfer, derives new bounds on cheating probabilities, and demonstrates an improved protocol with experimental realization.
Findings
Cheating probability lower bound of 2/3 for semirandom protocols.
Protocol achieves cheating probabilities of 3/4 and ~0.729 for sender and receiver.
Experimental implementation confirms protocol feasibility with honest and cheating parties.
Abstract
Oblivious transfer is an important primitive in modern cryptography. Applications include secure multiparty computation, oblivious sampling, e-voting, and signatures. Information-theoretically secure perfect 1-out-of 2 oblivious transfer is impossible to achieve. Imperfect variants, where both participants' ability to cheat is still limited, are possible using quantum means while remaining classically impossible. Precisely what security parameters are attainable remains unknown. We introduce a theoretical framework for studying semirandom quantum oblivious transfer, which is shown to be equivalent to regular oblivious transfer in terms of cheating probabilities. We then use it to derive bounds on cheating. We also present a protocol with lower cheating probabilities than previous schemes, together with its optical realization. We show that a lower bound of 2/3 on the minimum achievable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
