Asymmetric mass ratios for bright double neutron-star mergers
R. D. Ferdman (1), P. C. C. Freire (2), B. B. P. Perera (3), N. Pol (4, and 5), F. Camilo (6), S. Chatterjee (7, 8), J. M. Cordes (7, 8), F., Crawford (9), J. W. T. Hessels (10, 11), V. M. Kaspi (12, 13), M. A., McLaughlin (4, 5), E. Parent (12, 13), I. H. Stairs (14), J. van

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of the most asymmetric known merging double neutron star system, with a mass ratio of 0.78, suggesting such systems are more common than previously thought and may explain certain kilonova observations.
Contribution
It presents the first measurement of a significantly asymmetric merging double neutron star system, expanding the known population and implications for gravitational-wave and electromagnetic observations.
Findings
Most asymmetric merging DNS system known with q=0.78
Asymmetric binaries constitute 2-30% of merging DNS population
Such systems may explain GW170817's anomalous properties
Abstract
The discovery of a radioactively powered kilonova associated with the binary neutron star merger GW170817 was the first - and still only - confirmed electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave event. However, observations of late-time electromagnetic emission are in tension with the expectations from standard neutron-star merger models. Although the large measured ejecta mass is potentially explained by a progenitor system that is asymmetric in terms of the stellar component masses, i.e. with a mass ratio of 0.7-0.8, the known Galactic population of merging double neutron star (DNS) systems (i.e. those that will coalesce within billions of years or less) has, until now, only consisted of nearly equal-mass () binaries. PSR J1913+1102 is a DNS system in a 5-hour, low-eccentricity () orbit, implying an orbital separation of 1.8 solar radii, with the two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
