Optimal Decision Rules for Weak GMM
Isaiah Andrews, Anna Mikusheva

TL;DR
This paper develops optimal decision rules for weakly identified GMM models, introducing a quasi-Bayes approach with robust properties and proposing new tests and confidence sets for such settings.
Contribution
It derives the limit experiment for weak GMM, introduces a quasi-Bayes decision framework, and proposes robust tests and confidence sets for weak identification.
Findings
Quasi-Bayes decision rules have desirable properties under weak identification.
Proposed tests are weighted average power-optimal and robust to weak identification.
Established a Bernstein-von Mises-type result for the quasi-Bayes posterior.
Abstract
This paper studies optimal decision rules, including estimators and tests, for weakly identified GMM models. We derive the limit experiment for weakly identified GMM, and propose a theoretically-motivated class of priors which give rise to quasi-Bayes decision rules as a limiting case. Together with results in the previous literature, this establishes desirable properties for the quasi-Bayes approach regardless of model identification status, and we recommend quasi-Bayes for settings where identification is a concern. We further propose weighted average power-optimal identification-robust frequentist tests and confidence sets, and prove a Bernstein-von Mises-type result for the quasi-Bayes posterior under weak identification.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMerger and Competition Analysis · Global trade and economics
