Modeling semi-competing risks data as a longitudinal bivariate process
Daniel Nevo, Deborah Blacker, Eric B. Larson, Sebastien Haneuse

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel regression framework for semi-competing risks data, modeling the dependence between non-terminal and terminal events as a longitudinal bivariate process with clinical interpretability.
Contribution
It proposes a new approach that captures local and global dependence in semi-competing risks, allowing for richer clinical insights and accommodating complex data features.
Findings
Dependence between AD and death can be characterized as local and global.
Gender and APOE-$ extit{ε4}$ influence joint risk of AD and death.
Framework handles right censoring, left truncation, and time-varying covariates.
Abstract
The Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study is a long-running prospective study of incident all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD). As the cohort ages, death (a terminal event) is a prominent competing risk for AD (a non-terminal event), although the reverse is not the case. As such, analyses of data from ACT can be placed within the semi-competing risks framework. Central to semi-competing risks, and in contrast to standard competing risks, is that one can learn about the dependence structure between the two events. To-date, however, most methods for semi-competing risks treat dependence as a nuisance and not a potential source of new clinical knowledge. We propose a novel regression-based framework that views the two time-to-event outcomes through the lens of a longitudinal bivariate process on a partition of the time scale. A key innovation of the framework is that dependence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
