The impact of political party/candidate on the election results from a sentiment analysis perspective using #AnambraDecides2017 tweets
Ikechukwu Onyenwe, Samuel Nwagbo, Njideka Mbeledogu, Ebele Onyedinma

TL;DR
This study uses sentiment analysis of Twitter data to empirically examine how political party and candidate perceptions influence election outcomes in Anambra 2017.
Contribution
It introduces a sentiment analysis approach to quantify the impact of political actors on election results using Twitter discussions, incorporating polarity, subjectivity, and topic modeling.
Findings
Winning candidates benefit from positive party and candidate sentiments.
Twitter discussions show party affiliation influences public perception.
Sentiment and topic analysis reveal key factors affecting election success.
Abstract
This work investigates empirically the impact of political party control over its candidates or vice versa on winning an election using a natural language processing technique called sentiment analysis (SA). To do this, a set of 7430 tweets bearing or related to #AnambraDecides2017 was streamed during the November 18, 2017, Anambra State gubernatorial election. These are Twitter discussions on the top five political parties and their candidates termed political actors in this paper. We conduct polarity and subjectivity sentiment analyses on all the tweets considering time as a useful dimension of SA. Furthermore, we use the word frequency to find words most associated with the political actors in a given time. We find most talked about topics using a topic modeling algorithm and how the computed sentiments and most frequent words are related to the topics per political actor. Among…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
