
TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework for repeated matching markets where hospitals and residents interact over time, revealing that most hospitals can be incentivized to reduce capacity, unlike a small subset that remain static.
Contribution
It develops a dynamic model of repeated matching markets showing how incentives can influence hospital capacity decisions over time.
Findings
Most hospitals can be incentivized to reduce capacity in large markets.
A small fraction of hospitals remain untouchable and static.
Dynamic incentives can improve matching efficiency.
Abstract
This paper develops a framework for repeated matching markets. The model departs from the Gale-Shapley matching model by having a fixed set of long-lived hospitals match with a new generation of short-lived residents in every period. I show that there are two kinds of hospitals in this repeated environment: some hospitals can be motivated dynamically to voluntarily reduce their hiring capacity, potentially making more residents available to rural hospitals; the others, however, are untouchable even with repeated interaction and must obtain the same match as they do in a static matching. In large matching markets with correlated preferences, at most a vanishingly small fraction of the hospitals are untouchable. The vast majority of hospitals can be motivated using dynamic incentives.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
