Tradespace analysis of GNSS Space Segment Architectures
Filipe Pereira, Daniel Selva

TL;DR
This paper explores the design space of GNSS satellite constellations, considering technological advances and threats, and finds that certain orbital configurations can outperform current systems in cost and robustness.
Contribution
It revisits GNSS space segment design decisions using modern analysis techniques, providing new insights into optimal constellation configurations.
Findings
Constellations at ~2 Earth radii can outperform current GNSS in cost and robustness.
Sensitivity analysis highlights key factors influencing performance.
Association rule mining identifies optimal design trade-offs.
Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) provide ubiquitous, continuous and reliable positioning, navigation and timing information around the world. However, GNSS space segment design decisions have been based on the precursor Global Positioning System (GPS), which was designed in the 70s. This paper revisits those early design decisions in view of major technological advancements and new GNSS environmental threats. The rich tradespace between User Navigation Error (UNE) performance and constellation deployment costs is explored and conclusions are complemented by sensitivity analysis and association rule mining. This study finds that constellations at an orbit altitude of ~2 Earth radii can outperform existing GNSS in terms of cost, robustness and UNE. These insights should be taken into account when designing future generations of GNSS.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
