Comments on "On Semi-Invariant Submanifolds of Almost Complex Contact Metric Manifolds" (Facta Universitatis, Series: Mathematics and Informatics v. 31, no. 4, 851-862, 2016)
Aysel Turgut Vanli
TL;DR
This paper critiques previous work on semi-invariant submanifolds of almost complex contact metric manifolds, demonstrating that their foundational definitions are incorrect, which invalidates their results.
Contribution
It identifies and corrects errors in the definitions used in prior research, clarifying the proper understanding of semi-invariant submanifolds in this context.
Findings
Previous definitions are invalid
Results based on incorrect definitions are invalid
Clarification of correct definitions for semi-invariant submanifolds
Abstract
In this paper, we present the invalidities of the results in [3], because of their definition of a semi-invariant submanifold of an almost complex contact metric manifold is not true .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Geometry and complex manifolds · Point processes and geometric inequalities