The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Estimating Masses of Black Holes in Quasars with Single-Epoch Spectroscopy
Elena Dalla Bonta`, Bradley M. Peterson, Misty C. Bentz, W. N. Brandt,, Stefano Ciroi, Gisella De Rosa, Gloria Fonseca Alvarez, Catherine J. Grier,, P. B. Hall, Juan V. Hernandez Santisteban, Luis C. Ho, Y. Homayouni, Keith, Horne, C. S. Kochanek, Jennifer I-Hsiu Li

TL;DR
This paper evaluates methods for estimating black hole masses in quasars using single-epoch spectra, highlighting biases in line width measurements and proposing improved empirical formulas incorporating the Eddington ratio.
Contribution
It demonstrates that line dispersion reduces bias in mass estimates compared to FWHM and introduces simplified formulas that improve accuracy by including the Eddington ratio.
Findings
Line dispersion provides less biased mass estimates than FWHM.
Including Eddington ratio improves the accuracy of single-epoch mass estimates.
Using broad component luminosity of Hbeta simplifies mass estimation without loss of precision.
Abstract
It is well known that reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei (AGN) reveals a relationship between AGN luminosity and the size of the broad-line region, and that use of this relationship, combined with the Doppler width of the broad emission line, enables an estimate of the mass of the black hole at the center of the active nucleus based on a single spectrum. An unresolved key issue is the choice of parameter used to characterize the line width, either FWHM or line dispersion (the square root of the second moment of the line profile). We argue here that use of FWHM introduces a bias, stretching the mass scale such that high masses are overestimated and low masses are underestimated. Here we investigate estimation of black hole masses in AGNs based on individual or "single epoch" observations, with a particular emphasis in comparing mass estimates based on line dispersion and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
