Laser-induced stress wave propagation through smooth and rough substrates

TL;DR

This study examines how laser-induced stress waves propagate through smooth and rough titanium-coated glass substrates, finding that surface roughness below 1.2 μm does not significantly affect stress wave characteristics.

Contribution

It demonstrates that surface roughness up to 1.2 μm does not influence stress wave propagation, validating the use of smooth substrates as surrogates for roughened surfaces in laser-induced stress studies.

Findings

Surface roughness below 1.2 μm has no significant effect on stress wave amplitude.

Peak substrate stress and loading slope are similar for smooth and rough specimens.

Reflective panels are necessary for interferometry with rough surfaces.

Abstract

We investigate laser-induced acoustic wave propagation through smooth and roughened titanium-coated glass substrates. Acoustic waves are generated in a controlled manner via the laser spallation technique. Surface displacements are measured during stress wave loading by alignment of a Michelson-type interferometer. A reflective coverslip panel facilitates capture of surface displacements during loading of as-received smooth and roughened specimens. Through interferometric experiments we extract the substrate stress profile at each laser fluence (energy per area). The shape and amplitude of the substrate stress profile is analyzed at each laser fluence. Peak substrate stress is averaged and compared between smooth specimens with reflective panel and rough specimens with reflective panel. The reflective panel is necessary because the surface roughness of the rough specimens precludes in situ interferometry. Through these experiments we determine that the surface roughness employed has no significant effect on substrate stress propagation and smooth substrates are an appropriate surrogate to determine stress wave loading amplitude of roughened surfaces less than 1.2 {\mu}m average roughness (Ra). No significant difference was observed when comparing the average peak amplitude and loading slope in the stress wave profile for the smooth and rough configurations at each fluence.