
TL;DR
This paper proves that the set of Ulam numbers has zero natural density, meaning they become negligible compared to all natural numbers as numbers grow larger.
Contribution
It establishes that the natural density of Ulam numbers is zero, providing a rigorous mathematical proof of their sparse distribution.
Findings
Ulam numbers have zero natural density.
The proportion of Ulam numbers among natural numbers tends to zero.
Ulam numbers are asymptotically negligible in the set of natural numbers.
Abstract
In this paper, we show that the natural density of Ulam numbers satisfies . That is, we show that for \begin{align} \lim \limits_{k\longrightarrow \infty}\frac{\left |(U_m)\cap [1,k]\right |}{k}=0.\nonumber \end{align}
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
