Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learning
Mona Sloane, Emanuel Moss, Olaitan Awomolo, Laura Forlano

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes participation in machine learning design, warning against superficial engagement and emphasizing the need to recognize and avoid exploitative practices that hinder genuine community involvement.
Contribution
It highlights the risks of 'participation-washing' in ML and advocates for a shift away from superficial participation towards more ethical, context-aware community engagement.
Findings
Participation can be exploited or superficial
Current ML practices risk extractive community involvement
Calls for more ethical and context-sensitive participation methods
Abstract
This paper critically examines existing modes of participation in design practice and machine learning. Cautioning against 'participation-washing', it suggests that the ML community must become attuned to possibly exploitative and extractive forms of community involvement and shift away from the prerogatives of context-independent scalability.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
