Understanding coordination in global software engineering: A mixed-methods study on the use of meetings and Slack
Viktoria Stray, Nils Brede Moe

TL;DR
This study explores how global software engineering teams coordinate using meetings and Slack, revealing time spent, barriers, and benefits, and offers practical advice for improving coordination in distributed teams.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive mixed-methods analysis of coordination mechanisms in global software engineering, highlighting practical strategies for effective use of meetings and Slack.
Findings
Employees spend nearly 8 hours weekly in meetings.
Distributed teams are larger and spend more time in meetings.
Collaboration tools improve team awareness and reduce email reliance.
Abstract
Given the relevance of coordination in the field of global software engineering, this work was carried out to further understand coordination mechanisms. Specifically, we investigated meetings and the collaboration tool Slack. We conducted a longitudinal case study using a mixed-methods approach with surveys, observations, interviews, and chat logs. Our quantitative results show that employees in global projects spend 7 hours 45 minutes per week on average in scheduled meetings and 8 hours 54 minutes in unscheduled meetings. Furthermore, distributed teams were significantly larger than co-located teams, and people working in distributed teams spent somewhat more time in meetings per day. We found that low availability of key people, absence of organizational support for unscheduled meetings and unbalanced activity from team members in meetings and on Slack were barriers for effective…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
