Higher Criticism to Compare Two Large Frequency Tables, with sensitivity to Possible Rare and Weak Differences
David L. Donoho, Alon Kipnis

TL;DR
This paper adapts the Higher Criticism test to compare large frequency tables, effectively detecting rare and weak differences by analyzing the asymptotic power and phase transition behavior in various data regimes.
Contribution
It introduces a novel HC-based method for comparing large frequency tables, characterizing its asymptotic power and phase transition in sparse and dense data settings.
Findings
HC test achieves maximal power in a specific region of the parameter space.
The phase transition curve in high-counts matches that of the two-sample normal means model.
The method effectively detects rare and weak differences in large frequency tables.
Abstract
We adapt Higher Criticism (HC) to the comparison of two frequency tables which may -- or may not -- exhibit moderate differences between the tables in some unknown, relatively small subset out of a large number of categories. Our analysis of the power of the proposed HC test quantifies the rarity and size of assumed differences and applies moderate deviations-analysis to determine the asymptotic powerfulness/powerlessness of our proposed HC procedure. Our analysis considers the null hypothesis of no difference in underlying generative model against a rare/weak perturbation alternative, in which the frequencies of out of the categories are perturbed by in the Hellinger distance; here is the size of each sample. Our proposed Higher Criticism (HC) test for this setting uses P-values obtained from exact binomial tests. We characterize the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
