Developing a predictive signature for two trial endpoints using the cross-validated risk scores method
Svetlana Cherlin, James M. S. Wason

TL;DR
This paper extends the cross-validated risk scores (CVRS) method to jointly analyze two outcomes, enabling identification of patient subgroups benefiting on both, demonstrated through simulations and a psychiatry trial.
Contribution
The paper introduces CVRS2, a novel extension of CVRS for two outcomes, improving subgroup detection in high-dimensional data settings.
Findings
CVRS2 reliably identifies sensitive groups in simulated data.
Application to a psychiatry trial shows CVRS2 detects treatment effects on both outcomes.
CVRS2 outperforms the original CVRS in multi-outcome scenarios.
Abstract
The existing cross-validated risk scores (CVRS) design has been proposed for developing and testing the efficacy of a treatment in a high-efficacy patient group (the sensitive group) using high-dimensional data (such as genetic data). The design is based on computing a risk score for each patient and dividing them into clusters using a non-parametric clustering procedure. In some settings it is desirable to consider the trade-off between two outcomes, such as efficacy and toxicity, or cost and effectiveness. With this motivation, we extend the CVRS design (CVRS2) to consider two outcomes. The design employs bivariate risk scores that are divided into clusters. We assess the properties of the CVRS2 using simulated data and illustrate its application on a randomised psychiatry trial. We show that CVRS2 is able to reliably identify the sensitive group (the group for which the new treatment…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
