Testing the accuracy of 3D-HST photometric redshift estimates as reference samples for deep weak lensing studies
S.F.Raihan, T.Schrabback, H.Hildebrandt, D.Applegate, G.Mahler

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of 3D-HST photometric redshifts for weak lensing studies, identifying outliers and proposing methods to improve redshift estimates for better cluster mass measurements.
Contribution
It provides a detailed assessment of 3D-HST photo-z accuracy and suggests improvements to reduce biases in weak lensing analyses.
Findings
Identification of catastrophic outliers in 3D-HST photo-zs.
Interpolation of SED templates reduces redshift outliers.
Enhanced photometric data combination improves redshift accuracy.
Abstract
Accurate weak lensing mass estimates of clusters are needed in order to calibrate mass proxies for the cosmological exploitation of galaxy cluster surveys. Such measurements require accurate knowledge of the redshift distribution of the weak lensing source galaxies. In this context, we investigate the accuracy of photometric redshifts (photo-s) computed by the 3D-HST team for the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey fields, which provide a relevant photometric reference data set for deep weak lensing studies. Through the comparison to spectroscopic redshifts and photo-s based on very deep data from the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, we identify catastrophic redshift outliers in the 3D-HST/CANDELS catalogue. These would significantly bias weak lensing results if not accounted for. We investigate the cause of these outliers and demonstrate that the interpolation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
