Fidelity approach: the misleading role of finite size level crossing of excited energies
Somayyeh Nemati, Fatemeh Khastehdel Fumani, Saeed Mahdavifar

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of quantum fidelity in detecting phase transitions in a complex 1D spin model, revealing its limitations for analyzing the ground-state phase diagram despite its success in identifying certain phase transitions.
Contribution
The study clarifies the role of quantum fidelity in phase transition detection, highlighting its limitations in ground-state phase diagram analysis for the spin-1/2 quantum Ising model.
Findings
Quantum fidelity detects two phase transitions effectively.
Fidelity may not be suitable for ground-state phase diagram analysis.
Fidelity's role is misleading in certain complex models.
Abstract
Here, we show that, although quantum fidelity can truly identify two quantum phase transitions of a one-dimensional spin-1/2 quantum Ising model with competing nearest and next-nearest neighbour interactions in a transverse magnetic field, it may not be a suitable approach for analyzing its ground-state phase diagram.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum many-body systems · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
