Teaching assistants' performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties revealed by the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
Nafis I Karim, Alexandru Maries, and Chandralekha Singh

TL;DR
This study evaluates teaching assistants' ability to identify common student misconceptions in electricity and magnetism using the CSEM, revealing they often underestimate question difficulty and misjudge common incorrect answers.
Contribution
It provides insights into TAs' pedagogical content knowledge regarding student misconceptions in physics and highlights areas for improving TA training.
Findings
TAs struggled to accurately identify student misconceptions.
TAs underestimated the difficulty of CSEM questions.
TAs misjudged the prevalence of certain incorrect answers.
Abstract
We discuss research involving the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) to evaluate one aspect of the pedagogical content knowledge of teaching assistants (TAs): the knowledge of introductory students' alternate conceptions in electricity and magnetism as revealed by the CSEM. For each item on the CSEM, the TAs were asked to (1) identify the most common incorrect answer choice of introductory physics students and (2) predict the percentage of introductory students who would answer the question correctly in a post-test. Then, we used the CSEM post-test data from approximately 400 introductory physics students (provided in the original paper describing the CSEM) to assess the extent to which the TAs were able to identify the alternate conceptions of introductory students related to electricity and magnetism. In addition, we conducted think-aloud interviews with TAs who had…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
