Why aren't more theories named after women?: Teaching women's history in physics
Beth Parks

TL;DR
This paper examines historical social barriers that prevented women from becoming influential physicists and discusses how teaching this history can inspire students to overcome current gender disparities in physics.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of social factors limiting women's participation in physics and suggests educational strategies to address gender disparities.
Findings
Historical social barriers limited women's roles in physics.
Teaching women's history in physics can empower students.
Understanding past barriers may inspire more women to pursue physics.
Abstract
Barriers to women's education and employment in Europe and the U.S. in the nineteenth century made it unlikely that any women would be among the few physicists whose ideas are taught in high school and college courses. This paper explores the social settings in which three influential physicists worked--James Clerk Maxwell, Robert Millikan, and Albert Einstein--to better understand the limited opportunities available to women. By acknowledging and explaining why there weren't more women among these founding physicists, instructors may help students understand the barriers that still exist and feel more empowered to overcome them and pursue physics as a career.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
