Legends: Folklore on Reddit
Caitrin Armstrong, Derek Ruths

TL;DR
This paper introduces Reddit legends, a collection of iconic posts, and demonstrates their characteristics as folklore, enabling systematic analysis of their cultural significance and transmission on Reddit.
Contribution
It provides a typology and analysis framework for Reddit legends, establishing their status as folklore and demonstrating their suitability for systematic study.
Findings
Reddit legends exhibit consistent form and cultural significance.
They undergo spontaneous transmission similar to traditional folklore.
Reddit legends are amenable to text-based systematic analysis.
Abstract
In this paper we introduce Reddit legends, a collection of venerated old posts that have become famous on Reddit. To establish the utility of Reddit legends for both computational science/HCI and folkloristics, we investigate two main questions: (1) whether they can be considered folklore, i.e. if they have consistent form, cultural significance, and undergo spontaneous transmission, and (2) whether they can be studied in a systematic manner. Through several subtasks, including the creation of a typology, an analysis of references to Reddit legends, and an examination of some of the textual characteristics of referencing behaviour, we show that Reddit legends can indeed be considered as folklore and that they are amendable to systematic text-based approaches. We discuss how these results will enable future analyses of folklore on Reddit, including tracking subreddit-wide and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Humanities and Scholarship · Video Analysis and Summarization · Music and Audio Processing
