The $R$-Process Alliance: Fourth Data Release from the Search for $r$-Process-Enhanced Stars in the Galactic Halo
Erika M. Holmbeck, Terese T. Hansen, Timothy C. Beers, Vinicius M., Placco, Devin D. Whitten, Kaitlin C. Rasmussen, Ian U. Roederer, Rana, Ezzeddine, Charli M. Sakari, Anna Frebel, Maria R. Drout, Joshua D. Simon,, Ian B. Thompson, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Brad K. Gibson

TL;DR
This paper presents the fourth data release from the R-Process Alliance, redefining classification thresholds for $r$-process-enhanced stars based on statistical analysis, and reporting new identifications of such stars in the galactic halo.
Contribution
It introduces a new delineation between $r$-I and $r$-II stars based on statistical tests and applies this to identify more $r$-process-enhanced stars in the galactic halo.
Findings
Redefinition of $r$-I and $r$-II star classes based on [Eu/Fe] thresholds.
Identification of 72 new $r$-II stars and 232 new $r$-I stars.
Total of 42 new limited-$r$ stars identified.
Abstract
This compilation is the fourth data release from the -Process Alliance (RPA) search for -process-enhanced stars, and the second release based on "snapshot" high-resolution () spectra collected with the du Pont 2.5m Telescope. In this data release, we propose a new delineation between the -I and -II stellar classes at , instead of the empirically chosen level previously in use, based on statistical tests of the complete set of RPA data released to date. We also statistically justify the minimum level of [Eu/Fe] for definition of the -I stars, [Eu/Fe] . Redefining the separation between -I and -II stars will aid in analysis of the possible progenitors of these two classes of stars and whether these signatures arise from separate astrophysical sources at all. Applying this redefinition to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
