Limits of effective material properties in the context of an electromagnetic tissue model
Kevin Jerbic, Kevin Neumann, Jan Taro Svejda, Benedikt Sievert,, Andreas Rennings, Daniel Erni

TL;DR
This study investigates the frequency limits of homogenized tissue models in electromagnetic spectroscopy, revealing that traditional models are invalid at surprisingly low frequencies and proposing a machine learning approach for material classification.
Contribution
The paper introduces a hierarchical multiscale homogenization method and demonstrates its limitations, providing a new framework for frequency-selective tissue property classification.
Findings
Homogenized tissue models fail at low frequencies.
A machine learning classifier can identify material properties in forbidden frequency ranges.
Traditional models are valid only within a limited frequency band.
Abstract
Most calibration schemes for reflection-based tissue spectroscopy in the mm-wave/THz-frequency range are based on homogenized, frequency-dependent tissue models where macroscopic material parameters have either been determined by measurement or calculated using effective material theory. However, as the resolution of measurement at these frequencies captures the underlying microstructure of the tissue, here we will investigate the validity limits of such effective material models over a wide frequency range (10 MHz - 200 GHz) . Embedded in a parameterizable virtual workbench, we implemented a numerical homogenization method using a hierarchical multiscale approach to capture both the dispersive and tensorial electromagnetic properties of the tissue, and determined at which frequency this homogenized model deviated from a full-wave electromagnetic reference model within the framework of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
