Is a trillion trees enough?
C\'edric Mesnage, Michalis Vlachos

TL;DR
This paper presents a data-driven model to evaluate if planting a trillion trees, combined with reducing fossil fuel energy, can limit global warming to 1.5°C as per the Paris Agreement.
Contribution
It introduces a simple predictive model to assess the combined impact of afforestation and fossil fuel reduction on global temperature mitigation.
Findings
Planting a trillion trees plus reducing fossil fuel energy can meet the 1.5°C target.
Fossil fuel energy production must decrease to at least 10% of 2050 projections.
The model provides a quantitative basis for climate intervention strategies.
Abstract
Global warming is a major environmental concern of our times. It has been suggested that the planting of trees could constitute a way of mitigating the adverse effects of the increasing anthropogenic carbon emissions. We developed a simple data-driven model to predict the global average temperature in diverse scenarios to better understand the outcome of human interventions. We find that to remain under the 1.5 degree of anomaly set by the Paris agreement, the fossil-fuel energy production needs to decrease to at least 10% of the projected figure in 2050 combined with planting a trillion trees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClimate Change and Health Impacts · Urban Heat Island Mitigation · Climate variability and models
