A counterexample to vanishing conjectures for negative $K$-theory
Amnon Neeman

TL;DR
This paper disproves two conjectures claiming the vanishing of negative K-theory for certain categories, showing that these negative K-theories can be non-zero, thus challenging previous assumptions in algebraic K-theory.
Contribution
The paper provides counterexamples to longstanding conjectures about the vanishing of negative K-theory in abelian and t-structured categories.
Findings
Negative K-theory can be non-zero in some abelian categories.
Counterexamples disprove the vanishing conjectures from 2006 and 2019.
Challenges existing beliefs about negative K-theory behavior.
Abstract
In a 2006 article Schlichting conjectured that the negative {\it K--}theory of any abelian category must vanish. This conjecture was generalized in a 2019 article by Antieau, Gepner and Heller, who hypothesized that the negative {\it K--}theory of any category with a bounded {\it t--}structure must vanish. Both conjectures will be shown to be false.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
