Algorithms and complexity for geodetic sets on planar and chordal graphs
Dibyayan Chakraborty, Sandip Das, Florent Foucaud, Harmender Gahlawat,, Dimitri Lajou, Bodhayan Roy

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of the geodetic number problem on various graph classes, providing new algorithms for some subclasses and proving NP-hardness for others, advancing understanding of this problem in planar and chordal graphs.
Contribution
It introduces a linear-time algorithm for MGS on solid grids, shows NP-hardness on subcubic partial grids, and proves fixed parameter tractability for chordal graphs, while establishing NP-hardness on interval graphs.
Findings
Linear-time algorithm for MGS on solid grids
NP-hardness of MGS on subcubic partial grids
Fixed parameter tractability of MGS on chordal graphs
Abstract
We study the complexity of finding the \emph{geodetic number} on subclasses of planar graphs and chordal graphs. A set of vertices of a graph is a \emph{geodetic set} if every vertex of lies in a shortest path between some pair of vertices of . The \textsc{Minimum Geodetic Set (MGS)} problem is to find a geodetic set with minimum cardinality of a given graph. The problem is known to remain NP-hard on bipartite graphs, chordal graphs, planar graphs and subcubic graphs. We first study \textsc{MGS} on restricted classes of planar graphs: we design a linear-time algorithm for \textsc{MGS} on solid grids, improving on a -approximation algorithm by Chakraborty et al. (CALDAM, 2020) and show that it remains NP-hard even for subcubic partial grids of arbitrary girth. This unifies some results in the literature. We then turn our attention to chordal graphs, showing that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
