Comparison of improved TMD and CGC frameworks in forward quark dijet production

TL;DR

This paper compares the improved TMD (ITMD) and CGC frameworks for forward quark dijet production, evaluating the accuracy of ITMD against CGC at LHC energies in proton-proton and proton-nucleus collisions.

Contribution

It provides a quantitative assessment of ITMD's accuracy relative to CGC, highlighting the regimes where ITMD is a good approximation and where higher-twists become significant.

Findings

ITMD approximates CGC well at high jet momenta and large azimuthal angles.

Accuracy decreases at lower jet momenta, especially at small angles.

Higher-twist effects are more prominent in p+A collisions than in p+p collisions.

Abstract

For studying small-$x$ gluon saturation in forward dijet production in high-energy dilute-dense collisions, the improved TMD (ITMD) factorization formula was recently proposed. In the Color Glass Condensate (CGC) framework, it represents the leading term of an expansion in inverse powers of the hard scale. It contains the leading-twist TMD factorization formula relevant for small gluon's transverse momentum $k_t$, but also incorporates an all-order resummation of kinematical twists, resulting in a proper matching to high-energy factorization at large $k_t$. In this paper, we evaluate the accuracy of the ITMD formula quantitatively, for the case of quark dijet production in high-energy proton-proton($p+p$) and proton-nucleus ($p+A$) collisions at LHC energies. We do so by comparing the quark-antiquark azimuthal angle $\Delta\phi$ distribution to that obtained with the CGC formula. For a dijet with each quark momentum $p_t$ much larger than the target saturation scale, $Q_s$, the ITMD formula is a good approximation to the CGC formula in a wide range of azimuthal angle. It becomes less accurate as the jet $p_t$'s are lowered, as expected, due to the presence of genuine higher-twists contributions in the CGC framework, which represent multi-body scattering effects absent in the ITMD formula. We find that, as the hard jet momenta are lowered, the accuracy of ITMD start by deteriorating at small angles, in the high-energy-factorization regime, while in the TMD regime near $\Delta\phi=\pi$, very low values of $p_t$ are needed to see differences between the CGC and the ITMD formula. In addition, the genuine twists corrections to ITMD become visible for higher values of $p_t$ in $p+A$ collisions, compared to $p+p$ collisions, signaling that they are enhanced by the target saturation scale.