Scaling K2. III. Comparable Planet Occurrence in the FGK Samples of Campaign 5 and Kepler
Jon K. Zink, Kevin K. Hardegree-Ullman, Jessie L. Christiansen, Erik, A. Petigura, Courtney D. Dressing, Joshua E. Schlieder, David R. Ciardi, Ian, J. M. Crossfield

TL;DR
This study compares planet occurrence rates between K2 Campaign 5 and Kepler samples, finding similar overall occurrence suggesting Kepler data may serve as a Galactic baseline, with hints of metallicity influence on planet formation.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison of planet occurrence rates between K2 Campaign 5 and Kepler, highlighting similarities and potential metallicity effects.
Findings
Similar planet occurrence rates in K2 and Kepler samples.
Evidence supporting Kepler as a Galactic baseline.
Weak metallicity-driven formation trend observed.
Abstract
Using our K2 Campaign 5 fully automated planet detection data set (43 planets), which has corresponding measures of completeness and reliability, we infer an underlying planet population model for the FGK dwarfs sample (9,257 stars). Implementing a broken power-law for both the period and radius distribution, we find an overall planet occurrence of planets per star within a period range of 0.5-38 days. Making similar cuts and running a comparable analysis on the Kepler sample (2,318 planets; 94,222 stars), we find an overall occurrence of planets per star. Since the Campaign 5 field is nearly 120 angular degrees away from the Kepler field, this occurrence similarity offers evidence that the Kepler sample may provide a good baseline for Galactic inferences. Furthermore, the Kepler stellar sample is metal-rich compared to the K2 Campaign 5 sample, thus…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
