Thorn forking, weak normality, and theories with selectors
Daniel Max Hoffmann, Anand Pillay

TL;DR
This paper explores the role of weakly normal formulas in thorn forking, provides a counterexample to a previous result, and discusses theories with selectors, contributing to the understanding of model-theoretic forking concepts.
Contribution
It offers new insights into thorn forking, introduces a counterexample to an existing corollary, and discusses the concept of theories with selectors in model theory.
Findings
Counterexample to Corollary 4.2 from Ealy and Onshuus (2016)
Analysis of weakly normal formulas in thorn forking
Discussion on theories with selectors
Abstract
We discuss the role of weakly normal formulas in the theory of thorn forking, as part of a commentary on the paper "Thorn forking and stable forking" by Ealy and Onshuus (Rev. acad. colomb. cienc. exact. fis. nat. vol.40 no.157 Bogot\'a Oct./Dec. 2016). We also give a counterexample to Corollary 4.2 from that paper, and in the process discuss "theories with selectors".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCrystallization and Solubility Studies · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
