Reply to Comment on "Comparison of the Lateral Retention Forces on Sessile,Pendant, and Inverted Sessile Drops"
Rafael de la Madrid, Fabian Garza, Justin Kirk, Huy Luong, Levi, Snowden, Jonathan Taylor, Benjamin Vizena
TL;DR
This paper clarifies the authors' reasoning for not applying Tadmor's theory to their experimental results on lateral retention forces of different drop configurations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed explanation for the choice of theoretical framework, addressing concerns raised in a prior comment.
Findings
Clarifies the rationale for not using Tadmor's theory
Addresses specific issues raised in the comment
Reinforces the validity of the original experimental approach
Abstract
We address the issues raised in [R. Tadmor et al., Langmuir 2020, 36, 475-476]. In particular, we explain why we did not use Tadmor's theory to explain our results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInteractive and Immersive Displays · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity