Informing dark matter direct detection limits with the ARTEMIS simulations
Robert Poole-McKenzie, Andreea S. Font, Billy Boxer, Ian G. McCarthy,, Sergey Burdin, Sam G. Stafford, Shaun T. Brown

TL;DR
This paper uses high-resolution cosmological simulations to analyze the local dark matter distribution and velocity profiles, highlighting the importance of halo-to-halo scatter and baryonic effects for setting robust direct detection limits.
Contribution
It provides a detailed assessment of dark matter density and velocity distributions in Milky Way-like halos, emphasizing the impact of baryons and substructures on detection constraints.
Findings
Significant halo-to-halo scatter affects detection limit predictions.
Maxwellian velocity distribution approximation is generally reliable with baryons.
Baryonic effects reduce discrepancies in velocity distribution modeling.
Abstract
Dark matter (DM) direct detection experiments aim to place constraints on the DM--nucleon scattering cross-section and the DM particle mass. These constraints depend sensitively on the assumed local DM density and velocity distribution function. While astrophysical observations can inform the former (in a model-dependent way), the latter is not directly accessible with observations. Here we use the high-resolution ARTEMIS cosmological hydrodynamical simulation suite of 42 Milky Way-mass halos to explore the spatial and kinematical distributions of the DM in the solar neighbourhood, and we examine how these quantities are influenced by substructures, baryons, the presence of dark discs, as well as general halo-to-halo scatter (cosmic variance). We also explore the accuracy of the standard Maxwellian approach for modelling the velocity distribution function. We find significant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
