A statistical standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave compact object merger GW190814 and Dark Energy Survey galaxies
A. Palmese, J. deVicente, M. E. S. Pereira, J. Annis, W. Hartley, K., Herner, M. Soares-Santos, M. Crocce, D. Huterer, I. Magana Hernandez, T. M., Davis, A. Garcia, J. Garcia-Bellido, J. Gschwend, D. E. Holz, R. Kessler, O., Lahav, R. Morgan, C. Nicolaou, C. Conselice

TL;DR
This paper measures the Hubble constant using gravitational wave event GW190814 as a standard siren, employing a statistical approach with galaxy catalogs from the Dark Energy Survey, and combines it with other GW events for improved cosmological constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a novel statistical framework for estimating $H_0$ from GW events without electromagnetic counterparts, utilizing photometric redshift catalogs and reanalyzing previous GW events within this framework.
Findings
Estimated $H_0$ as 72.0 km/s/Mpc with uncertainties.
Demonstrated that well-localized GW events without counterparts significantly improve $H_0$ constraints.
Showed combining multiple GW events enhances the precision of cosmological measurements.
Abstract
We present a measurement of the Hubble constant using the gravitational wave (GW) event GW190814, which resulted from the coalescence of a 23 black hole with a 2.6 compact object, as a standard siren. No compelling electromagnetic counterpart has been identified for this event, thus our analysis accounts for thousands of potential host galaxies within a statistical framework. The redshift information is obtained from the photometric redshift (photo-) catalog from the Dark Energy Survey. The luminosity distance is provided by the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave sky map. Since this GW event has the second-smallest localization volume after GW170817, GW190814 is likely to provide the best constraint on cosmology from a single standard siren without identifying an electromagnetic counterpart. Our analysis uses photo- probability distribution functions and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
