TL;DR
This paper proposes a biologically plausible predictive learning mechanism involving the pulvinar nucleus and layer 5 neurons, demonstrating its effectiveness in a large-scale visual system model that categorizes 3D objects in line with human and primate neural data.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed neural mechanism for predictive error-driven learning and implements it in a large-scale visual model, showing biologically plausible error backpropagation.
Findings
Model learns invariant 3D object categories from raw visual input.
Categories align with human judgments and primate neural data.
Demonstrates a biologically plausible error-driven learning process.
Abstract
How do humans learn from raw sensory experience? Throughout life, but most obviously in infancy, we learn without explicit instruction. We propose a detailed biological mechanism for the widely-embraced idea that learning is based on the differences between predictions and actual outcomes (i.e., predictive error-driven learning). Specifically, numerous weak projections into the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus generate top-down predictions, and sparse, focal driver inputs from lower areas supply the actual outcome, originating in layer 5 intrinsic bursting (5IB) neurons. Thus, the outcome is only briefly activated, roughly every 100 msec (i.e., 10 Hz, alpha), resulting in a temporal difference error signal, which drives local synaptic changes throughout the neocortex, resulting in a biologically-plausible form of error backpropagation learning. We implemented these mechanisms in a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
