Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey
Asli Celikyilmaz, Elizabeth Clark, Jianfeng Gao

TL;DR
This survey reviews recent evaluation methods for natural language generation, categorizing them into human-centric, automatic, and machine-learned metrics, highlighting progress, challenges, and future directions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive categorization and analysis of NLG evaluation methods, including case studies and future research proposals.
Findings
Progress in evaluation metrics for neural NLG models
Challenges in evaluating long and diverse text generation
Identification of promising future research directions
Abstract
The paper surveys evaluation methods of natural language generation (NLG) systems that have been developed in the last few years. We group NLG evaluation methods into three categories: (1) human-centric evaluation metrics, (2) automatic metrics that require no training, and (3) machine-learned metrics. For each category, we discuss the progress that has been made and the challenges still being faced, with a focus on the evaluation of recently proposed NLG tasks and neural NLG models. We then present two examples for task-specific NLG evaluations for automatic text summarization and long text generation, and conclude the paper by proposing future research directions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Speech and dialogue systems
