Newton retraction as approximate geodesics on submanifolds
Ruda Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces Newton retraction as a stable, computationally efficient approximation of geodesics on submanifolds, with advantages for optimization and statistical problems on manifolds.
Contribution
It presents Newton retraction as a third-order matching, superior in stability and cost compared to existing approaches like orthographic retraction.
Findings
Newton retraction is more stable than orthographic retraction.
NR has a larger superlinear convergence region.
NR always has lower computational cost.
Abstract
Efficient approximation of geodesics is crucial for practical algorithms on manifolds. Here we introduce a class of retractions on submanifolds, induced by a foliation of the ambient manifold. They match the projective retraction to the third order and thus match the exponential map to the second order. In particular, we show that Newton retraction (NR) is always stabler than the popular approach known as oblique projection or orthographic retraction: per Kantorovich-type convergence theorems, the superlinear convergence regions of NR include those of the latter. We also show that NR always has a lower computational cost. The preferable properties of NR are useful for optimization, sampling, and many other statistical problems on manifolds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Advanced Vision and Imaging · Morphological variations and asymmetry
