Could regulating the creators deliver trustworthy AI?
Labhaoise Ni Fhaolain, Andrew Hines

TL;DR
This paper explores whether establishing a regulated profession like AI Architect could enhance trustworthiness in AI systems, addressing legal, ethical, and standards-based concerns amidst widespread AI deployment.
Contribution
It proposes the concept of a regulated AI profession to improve accountability and trustworthiness in AI development and deployment.
Findings
Regulation could increase transparency and accountability.
Establishing a new profession may address ethical and legal concerns.
Challenges include defining standards and global consistency.
Abstract
Is a new regulated profession, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) Architect who is responsible and accountable for AI outputs necessary to ensure trustworthy AI? AI is becoming all pervasive and is often deployed in everyday technologies, devices and services without our knowledge. There is heightened awareness of AI in recent years which has brought with it fear. This fear is compounded by the inability to point to a trustworthy source of AI, however even the term "trustworthy AI" itself is troublesome. Some consider trustworthy AI to be that which complies with relevant laws, while others point to the requirement to comply with ethics and standards (whether in addition to or in isolation of the law). This immediately raises questions of whose ethics and which standards should be applied and whether these are sufficient to produce trustworthy AI in any event.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
