Horseshoe Co-orbitals of Earth: Current Population and New Candidates
Murat Kaplan, Sergen Cengiz

TL;DR
This study investigates Earth's horseshoe co-orbitals, identifying new candidates and analyzing their dynamical behavior, stability durations, and libration periods, revealing diverse orbital characteristics and chaotic tendencies among these near-Earth objects.
Contribution
The paper identifies new horseshoe co-orbital candidates and provides detailed dynamical analysis of their stability and orbital periods, expanding understanding of Earth's co-orbital population.
Findings
Asteroids 2016 CO$_{246}$, 2017 SL$_{16}$, and 2017 XQ$_{60}$ are asymmetrical horseshoe orbiters.
Asteroid 2018 PN$_{22}$ exhibits chaotic behavior and may not stay in a horseshoe orbit beyond 200 years.
Horseshoe libration periods range from 125 to 411 years among studied objects.
Abstract
Most co-orbital objects in the Solar system are thought to follow tadpole-type orbits, behaving as Trojans. However, most of Earth's identified co-orbitals are moving along horseshoe-type orbits. The current tally of minor bodies considered to be Earth co-orbitals amounts to 18; of them, 12 are horseshoes, five are quasi-satellites, and one is a Trojan. The semimajor axis values of all these bodies librate between au and au. In this work, we have studied the dynamical behaviour of objects following orbits with semimajor axis within this range that may be in a 1:1 mean-motion resonance with Earth. Our results show that asteroids 2016 CO, 2017 SL, and 2017 XQ are moving along asymmetrical horseshoe-type orbits; the asteroid 2018 PN follows a nearly symmetric or regular horseshoe-type orbit. Asteroids 2016 CO, 2017 SL, and 2017…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
