TL;DR
This paper introduces models that explicitly account for spatial interactions between individuals in cities, improving urban scaling law analyses and allowing for more accurate inference of scaling exponents.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian modeling approach that incorporates spatial interactions, overcoming boundary definition issues in urban scaling studies.
Findings
Including spatial interactions improves model fit.
Spatial interactions alter the estimated scaling exponents.
Models with interactions outperform traditional independent models.
Abstract
Analyses of urban scaling laws assume that observations in different cities are independent of the existence of nearby cities. Here we introduce generative models and data-analysis methods that overcome this limitation by modelling explicitly the effect of interactions between individuals at different locations. Parameters that describe the scaling law and the spatial interactions are inferred from data simultaneously, allowing for rigorous (Bayesian) model comparison and overcoming the problem of defining the boundaries of urban regions. Results in five different datasets show that including spatial interactions typically leads to better models and a change in the exponent of the scaling law. Data and codes are provided in Ref. [1].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
