Retiree mortality forecasting: A partial age-range or a full age-range model?
Han Lin Shang, Steven Haberman

TL;DR
This paper compares partial and full age-range models for forecasting retiree mortality, finding that truncating data before modeling yields better short-term forecasts, but long-term predictions remain challenging.
Contribution
It provides an empirical comparison of partial versus full age-range mortality models using data from developed countries, highlighting the advantages of the partial approach for short-term forecasts.
Findings
Partial age-range models outperform full models in short-term accuracy.
Long-term forecast accuracy remains uncertain for both strategies.
Expert-based expectation methods could complement statistical models for long-term forecasts.
Abstract
An essential input of annuity pricing is the future retiree mortality. From observed age-specific mortality data, modeling and forecasting can be taken place in two routes. On the one hand, we can first truncate the available data to retiree ages and then produce mortality forecasts based on a partial age-range model. On the other hand, with all available data, we can first apply a full age-range model to produce forecasts and then truncate the mortality forecasts to retiree ages. We investigate the difference in modeling the logarithmic transformation of the central mortality rates between a partial age-range and a full age-range model, using data from mainly developed countries in the Human Mortality Database (2020). By evaluating and comparing the short-term point and interval forecast accuracies, we recommend the first strategy by truncating all available data to retiree ages and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
