The kinematics of massive quiescent galaxies at $1.4 < z < 2.1$: dark matter fractions, IMF variation, and the relation to local early-type galaxies
J. Trevor Mendel, Alessandra Beifiori, Roberto Saglia, Ralf Bender,, Gabe Brammer, Jeffrey Chan, Natascha Forster Schreiber, Matteo Fossati,, Audrey Galametz, Iva Momcheva, Erica Nelson, Dave Wilman, and Stijn Wuyts

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolution of massive quiescent galaxies from redshift 2 to the present, revealing increased dark matter fractions and consistent IMF variations, and providing insights into galaxy growth and dark matter assembly.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of dark matter fractions and IMF variations in massive quiescent galaxies at high redshift, linking their evolution to local galaxy properties.
Findings
Dark matter fraction increased by over 4 times since z~1.8.
Dynamical-to-stellar mass ratio grew by ~0.2 dex from z=2 to now.
The correlation between velocity dispersion and IMF variation exists at z=2.
Abstract
We study the dynamical properties of massive quiescent galaxies at using deep Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/F160W imaging and a combination of literature stellar velocity dispersion measurements and new near-infrared spectra obtained using KMOS on the ESO VLT. We use these data to show that the typical dynamical-to-stellar mass ratio has increased by 0.2 dex from to the present day, and investigate this evolution in the context of possible changes in the stellar initial mass function (IMF) and/or fraction of dark matter contained within the galaxy effective radius, . Comparing our high-redshift sample to their likely descendants at low-redshift, we find that has increased by a factor of more than 4 since , from = % to 24%. The observed increase appears robust to changes in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
