Stellar parameters for the First Release of the MaStar Library: An Empirical Approach
Yan-Ping Chen, Renbin Yan, Claudia Maraston, Daniel Thomas, Guy S., Stringfellow, Dmitry Bizyaev, Joseph D Gelfand, Timothy C. Beers, Jos\'e G., Fern\'andez-Trincado, Daniel Lazarz, Lewis Hill, Niv Drory, Keivan G. Stassun

TL;DR
This paper presents the determination of stellar atmospheric parameters for over 7500 spectra in the MaStar library using an empirical interpolation method based on the MILES spectral library, covering a wide parameter space.
Contribution
It introduces a robust empirical approach to derive stellar parameters for the MaStar library, expanding the parameter coverage and assessing the robustness of the fits.
Findings
7503 spectra have robust stellar parameters.
Parameters cover a wide range: 3179K to 20517K in temperature, 0.40 to 5.0 in log g, -2.49 to 0.73 in [Fe/H].
Method identifies reliable fits based on local density proxy.
Abstract
We report the stellar atmospheric parameters for 7503 spectra contained in the first release of the MaNGA stellar library (MaStar) in SDSS DR15. The first release of MaStar contains 8646 spectra measured from 3321 unique stars, each covering the wavelength range 3622 \AA\ to 10354 \AA\ with a resolving power of 1800. In this work, we first determined the basic stellar parameters: effective temperature (), surface gravity (), and metallicity (), which best fit the data using an empirical interpolator based on the Medium-resolution Isaac Newton Telescope library of empirical spectra (MILES), as implemented by the University of Lyon Spectroscopic analysis Software (Koleva et al. 2008, ULySS) package. While we analyzed all 8646 spectra from the first release of MaStar, since MaStar has a wider parameter-space coverage than MILES, not all of these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
