
TL;DR
This paper investigates prime running functions that sum prime gaps in specific residue classes, revealing systematic biases and comparing empirical data with modified Cramér models to understand these biases.
Contribution
It introduces modified Cramér models to explain observed biases in prime gap sums across residue classes, supported by empirical data analysis.
Findings
Systematic biases of order x / log x in prime running functions.
Modified Cramér models predict these biases accurately.
Empirical data confirms the models' predictions.
Abstract
We study arithmetic functions , called prime running functions, whose value at sums the gaps between primes below and the next following prime , up to . (The following prime may be in any residue class .) We empirically observe systematic biases of order in for different . We formulate modified Cram\'er models for primes and show that the corresponding sum of prime gap statistics exhibits systematic biases of this order of magnitude. The predictions of such modified Cram\'er models are compared with the experimental data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
