TL;DR
This review traces 70 years of machine learning development in geoscience, highlighting shifts from traditional methods to deep learning, and emphasizing the importance of model validation and interdisciplinary skills.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive historical overview and analysis of machine learning applications in geoscience, including code examples and insights into methodological shifts.
Findings
Kriging has evolved into a mainstream machine learning method.
Neural networks have been historically applied in geoscience.
Recent developments in deep learning are driven by hardware and software advances.
Abstract
This review gives an overview of the development of machine learning in geoscience. A thorough analysis of the co-developments of machine learning applications throughout the last 70 years relates the recent enthusiasm for machine learning to developments in geoscience. I explore the shift of kriging towards a mainstream machine learning method and the historic application of neural networks in geoscience, following the general trend of machine learning enthusiasm through the decades. Furthermore, this chapter explores the shift from mathematical fundamentals and knowledge in software development towards skills in model validation, applied statistics, and integrated subject matter expertise. The review is interspersed with code examples to complement the theoretical foundations and illustrate model validation and machine learning explainability for science. The scope of this review…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
