TL;DR
This paper develops a method to estimate causal effects in Alzheimer's research despite unobserved confounders by using a probabilistic latent factor model to identify substitute confounders, improving causal inference from observational neuroimaging data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach leveraging dependencies among causes to identify causal effects without measuring all confounders, validated through theoretical proofs and empirical data.
Findings
The method enables causal effect identifiability with unmeasured confounders.
It successfully uncovers important causes in Alzheimer's data.
The approach outperforms traditional methods in semi-synthetic experiments.
Abstract
Studying the relationship between neuroanatomy and cognitive decline due to Alzheimer's has been a major research focus in the last decade. However, to infer cause-effect relationships rather than simple associations from observational data, we need to (i) express the causal relationships leading to cognitive decline in a graphical model, and (ii) ensure the causal effect of interest is identifiable from the collected data. We derive a causal graph from the current clinical knowledge on cause and effect in the Alzheimer's disease continuum, and show that identifiability of the causal effect requires all confounders to be known and measured. However, in complex neuroimaging studies, we neither know all potential confounders nor do we have data on them. To alleviate this requirement, we leverage the dependencies among multiple causes by deriving a substitute confounder via a probabilistic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
