Isospin-density dependent pairing from infinite nuclear matter to finite nuclei

TL;DR

This study evaluates different isovector pairing interactions derived from nuclear matter to determine their effectiveness in describing pairing phenomena in finite nuclei, finding that the interaction from nuclear matter (P1) performs best.

Contribution

The paper introduces and compares four isovector pairing interactions, highlighting that the one derived from nuclear matter calculations (P1) better reproduces experimental data than others.

Findings

Interaction P1 better describes OEM staggering in Ni, Zr, Sn isotopes.

P1 outperforms P2 by 14.3% to 41% in RMS deviations.

P4, the isoscalar interaction, performs the worst.

Abstract

The effective isospin-density dependent pairing interaction (P1) [S. S. Zhang, U. Lombardo and E. G. Zhao, Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astro. {\bf 54}, 236 (2011)] extracted from neutron pairing gaps for $^1$S$_0$ in asymmetric nuclear matter calculations [S. S. Zhang, L. G. Cao, U. Lombardo, et al. Phys. Rev. C {\bf 81}, 044313 (2010)] is employed to study the bulk properties of Ca, Ni, Zr and Sn isotopes. The odd-even mass (OEM) staggering is calculated by the Skyrme Hartree-Fock plus BCS method (SHF + BCS) with the SkP interaction. For comparison, we study two other types of isovector effective pairing interactions. One is also extracted from pairing gaps of infinite nuclear matter by the Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (BHF) method but for free spectrum (P2). The other is obtained by fitting the empirical OEM (P3). An isoscalar effective pairing interaction (P4) is also adopted which is determined by fitting the empirical OEM. We find that interaction P1 can better describe the OEM staggering of Ni, Zr and Sn isotopes by $14.3 \%, 41 \%, 30.4 \%$ compared with interaction P2, in terms of root mean square deviations to the empirical OEM, respectively. On the other hand, the performance of P1 and P2 is comparable for Ca isotopes. For Ca and Ni isotopes, P1 behaves similarly as P3, but for Zr isotopes P1 is better than P3 by $\sim 34 \%$. Among the four pairing interactions studied, P4 performs the worst. Therefore, one may conclude that for neutron pairings in finite nuclei, the isovector pairings are preferred than the isoscalar one. It is quite interesting to note that the pairing interaction P1 extracted from nuclear matter calculations can describe pairing gaps of finite nuclei as well as or even better than the interaction P3 directly fitted to finite nuclei.