Interaction Between Coordinated and Droop Control PV Inverters

TL;DR

This paper evaluates how coordinated inverter control can improve voltage regulation and grid support in PV systems, highlighting its effectiveness and limitations in different network scenarios with high PV penetration.

Contribution

It introduces and analyzes the deployment scenarios of coordinated inverter control, demonstrating its potential and constraints in mitigating voltage issues in PV-rich networks.

Findings

Coordinated inverters mitigate overvoltages in 85% of cases on a 114-node network.

Effectiveness decreases to 37% on a 906-node network with high passive inverter build-up.

Coordinated inverters can partially offset passive inverter responses during grid regulation.

Abstract

Autonomous droop control PV inverters have improved voltage regulation compared to the inverters without grid support functions, but more flexible control techniques will be required as the number of solar photovoltaic (PV) installations increases. This paper studies three inverter future deployment scenarios with droop control inverters, non-exporting inverters, and coordinated inverter control (CIC). The network operation and the interaction between various inverter control methods are studied by simulating inverter operation on two low-voltage networks. Considering 30% PV penetration as the base case, we demonstrate that coordinated inverters can mitigate overvoltages and voltage fluctuations caused by the tripping of passive inverters in 85% of PV location cases when at least as many coordinated as passive inverters are deployed on the 114-node test feeder. However, this rate reduced to 37% with the IEEE 906-node network demonstrating that the deployment of coordinated inverter control may not be able to reverse passive inverter-related voltage disturbances when the build-up of passive inverters has reached a certain threshold. The aggregated PV output from coordinated inverters can be also used to provide grid support services. When the low-voltage networks operate close to the upper voltage limits, the change in the power output from coordinated inverters following a regulation request may be partially offset by passive inverters. Considering an equal number of passive and coordinated inverters, this paper shows that for each unit of the down-regulation request delivered by coordinated inverters, passive inverter output may increase by up to 0.2 units and decrease by up to 0.45 units during coordinated inverter up-regulation.