The Mondrian Puzzle: A Bound Concerning the $M(n) = 0$ Case
Cooper O'Kuhn, Todd Fellman

TL;DR
This paper establishes a lower bound on the count of integers less than a threshold for which the Mondrian Puzzle's minimal rectangle area difference is non-zero, contributing to understanding the puzzle's solutions.
Contribution
It provides a new lower bound on the number of integers where the minimal difference in rectangle areas in the Mondrian Puzzle is non-zero.
Findings
Lower bound on the count of integers with M(n) ≠ 0
Insights into the distribution of solutions to the Mondrian Puzzle
Connections to tileability and geometric constraints
Abstract
In response to the Numberphile video regarding the Mondrian Puzzle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49KvZrioFB0, we provide a lower bound on how many integers less than a given threshold satisfy where is the quantity in which the Mondrian Puzzle is interested, i.e. the minimal difference in area between the largest and smallest rectangle in a set of incongruent, integer-sided rectangles which tile an by square.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Art History and Market Analysis
